Concepts and Challenges in the Biophysics of Hearing: by Nigel P. Cooper, David T. Kemp
By Nigel P. Cooper, David T. Kemp
This e-book is a compilation of state of the art learn at the mechanical operation of the peripheral auditory process. Bringing jointly over 50 theoretical and experimental stories through best researchers, it covers the molecular, mobile and platforms degrees utilizing a robust mix of organic, mathematical and engineering strategies. as well as the medical papers, the e-book comprises the reviews and discussions raised by way of the person manuscripts on the time in their presentation, and a last bankruptcy with the edited transcripts of a dialogue consultation protecting 'outstanding subject matters' among the most well-liked researchers within the field.The first-hand details supplied by means of those transcripts will make the e-book rather fascinating. popular members to the publication contain Profs. JF Ashmore (FRS, UK), E de Boer (The Netherlands), W Brownell (USA), P Dallos (USA), R Fettiplace (FRS, USA), AW Gummer (Germany), AJ Hudspeth (USA), DC Mountain (USA), AL Nuttall (USA), IJ Russell (FRS, UK), CA Shera (USA), and H Wada (Japan).
Read Online or Download Concepts and Challenges in the Biophysics of Hearing: Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on the Mechanics of Hearing, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK 27 - 31 July 2008 PDF
Best biophysics books
Additional info for Concepts and Challenges in the Biophysics of Hearing: Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on the Mechanics of Hearing, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK 27 - 31 July 2008
Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 1612-1629. 7. , 1980. Intracochlear sound pressure measurements in guinea pigs. Hear. Res. 2, 191-205. 8. , 2005. Measurements of selected parameters of the guinea pig temporal bone. Folia Morphol. ) 64, 145-150. 19 DIFFERENTIAL INTRACOCHLEAR SOUND PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS IN NORMAL HUMAN TEMPORAL BONES HIDEKO HEIDI NAKAJIMA1,2, WEI DONG4, ELIZABETH S. OLSON4, SAUMIL N. MERCHANT1,2, MICHAEL E. RAVICZ2,3, JOHN J. , Mass. , Boston, MA 02114, USA 3 Resarch Lab. of Electronics, Mass.
The 3 data sets share many similarities (Figure 5): In particular, the impedances are mostly resistive and have an order of magnitude of about 1011 acoustic ohms. The differences in magnitude between our Figure 5. ’s below 500 Hz and Impedance with other chinchilla studies. between 3 and 10 kHz are consistent with the larger GME we measured at these frequencies. Acknowledgments We thank Elizabeth Olson for her assistance in making the fiber-optic pressure sensors, Melissa Wood for her mastery of chinchilla surgery, the staff of the Eaton-Peabody Laboratory, and the staff of the Microsystems Technology Laboratories at MIT.
4. Nakajima, H. , Ravicz, M. , Merchant, S. , Peake, W. , Rosowski, J. , 2005. Experimental ossicular fixations and the middle ear’s response to sound: Evidence for a flexible ossicular chain. Hear. , 204, 60-77. 5. Olson, E. , 1998. Observing middle and inner ear mechanics with novel intracochlear pressure sensors. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3445-3463. 6. , 1980. Sound pressure in the basal turn of the cat cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 68, 1676-1680. 7. , 1980. Intracochelar sound pressure measurements in guinea pigs.