Representation Theory of Finite Groups: Proceedings of a by Ronald Solomon
By Ronald Solomon
Includes articles by way of a number of the individuals on the convention on modular illustration conception of finite teams, which happened lower than the auspices of the Mathematical examine Institute of the Ohio country collage with extra help from the nationwide technology origin. The ebook is addressed to experts and scholars within the box of crew illustration conception, together with either the overall concept and the particular theories regarding the representations of the symmetric teams and the finite teams of Lie kind. newest reviews are given on very important conjectures together with the Lusztig conjecture, the Alperin-McKay-Dade conjectures and the k(GV) challenge. very important new study avenues are illuminated, together with the speculation of infinite-dimensional modules for finite teams and the idea of Rickard equivalences of module different types.
Read Online or Download Representation Theory of Finite Groups: Proceedings of a Special Research Quarter at the Ohio State University, Spring 1995 PDF
Similar symmetry and group books
The contents of this publication were used in classes given by way of the writer. the 1st was once a one-semester path for seniors on the college of British Columbia; it was once transparent that solid undergraduates have been completely in a position to dealing with basic workforce conception and its program to easy quantum chemical difficulties.
Extra resources for Representation Theory of Finite Groups: Proceedings of a Special Research Quarter at the Ohio State University, Spring 1995
The table algebras Tm(A) for m ~ 2 never arise as (Z(CG), Cla(G)), (Ch(G), Irr(G)), or any substructure thereof, for any finite group G. The equation XQXm-1 = CUm-1 + f3iQ holds in T m (A), whereas there existnoelements b, c in Cla(G) or Irr(G) with c =I- b, b =I- b, and SUPPB(bc) = b} [AI, Corollary E']. rc, We recently have determined all integral table algebras (A, B) which are homogeneous of degree 3, and for which B contains a faithful, real element [BX2]. The full result is too detailed to give here, so we restrict to the case where B contains no nontriviallinear elements.
26)] and [Sy]). Here we will only use the canonical induction formula Qc. 2. Without going into details we should try to make clear that the group Rf(G) is a very natural construction. Note that the groups R(H), H ::: G, are tied together by homomorphisms Cg,H: R(H) ---+ R( gH), res~: R(H) ---+ R(K), ind~: R(K) ---+ R(H), for K ::: H ::: G, g E G, called conjugation, restriction and induction. These homomorphisms satisfy certain compatibility conditions which are the axioms of a Mackey functor on G.
Austral. Math. Soc. 20 (1979), 35-55. Degrees and Diagrams of Integral Table Algebras 27 [Sc] I. Schur, Zur Theorie der einfach transitiven Permutations-gruppen, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. -Math. K1, 1933,598-623. [SI] p. Slodowy, Simple Singularities and Simple Algebraic Groups, Lecture Notes in Math. 815, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980. edu Canonical Induction Formulae and the Defect of a Character R. Bo/tje Abstract. We explain the idea and the machinery of canonical induction formulae with going as little into details as possible and show that a certain version keeps track of the i-defect d(X) of an irreducible character X of a finite group G by mapping X precisely to the d (X)-th layer in the filtration A ~ i-I A ~ i- 2 A ...